Community Housing Improvement Program et al v City of New York et al
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peAgTO_sLf4&feature=youtu.be&t=9850
https://www.docketbird.com/court-documents/Community-Housing-Improvement-Program-et-al-v-City-of-New-York-et-al/Letter-dated-October-8-2019-from-Towaki-Komatsu-to-Judge-Brodie-requesting-that-the-motion-to-intervene-be-granted/nyed-1:2019-cv-04087-00042
Towaki
Komatsu
802
Fairmount
PL
Apt.
4B
Bronx,
NY
10460
Tel:
718-450-6951
E-mail:
Towaki
Komatsu@vahoo.com
October
8,
2019
United
States
District
Judge
Margo
Brodi
United
States
District
Court
225
Cadman
Plaza
East
Brooklyn,
New
York
11201
Re:
Community
Housing
Improvement
Program
v.
City
of
New
York,
No.
19-CV-4087
(MKB)(RML)
(E.D.N.Y.)
Dear
Judge
Brodi,
The
letter
dated
10/4/19
that
Michael
Berg
of
the
New
York
State
Attorney
General's
fi
led
in
this
action
is
a
nullity.
This
is
mainly
because
he
didn't
request
my
consent
to
receive
any
fi
lings
in
this
action
fi
-om
him
via
e-mail
and
I
haven't
consented
to
that.
Since
he
is
an
attorney,
this
Court
mustn't
grant
him
any
leniency
with
respect
to
complying
with
all
applicable
procedures
in
relation
to
this
action
that
includes
proper
service
of
papers.
Furthermore,
attorneys
specialize
in
lying,
misleading,
expressing
half-truths,
conveniently
omitting
material
facts,
and
gamesmanship.
I
am
not
among
Mr.
Berg's
ilk
in
that
respect.
Mr.
Berg
neglected
to
inform
this
court
about
the
following
pertinent
facts
that
relate
to
the
remarks
that
he
expressed
in
the
letter
dated
10/4/19
that
I
received
fi
*om
him
via
e-mail
at
5:12
pm
on
10/4/19:
1.
I
haven't
been
contacted
by
the
plaintiffs
in
this
action
nor
their
attorneys
and
have
no
reason
to
believe
that
views
expressed
by
Mr.
Berg
in
his
communications
to
me
reflect
their
views.
Page
1
of
15
Case 1:19-cv-04087-MKB-RLM Document 42 Filed 10/08/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 271
2.
The
following
requests
for
relief
are
among
those
specified
by
the
plaintiffs
in
this
action
on
page
119
and
120
in
the
complaint
that
was
fi
led
in
this
action:
a.
"Declare
the
Rent
Stabilization
Laws
to
be
an
unlawful
violation
of
Due
Process"
b.
"Enjoin
the
application
and
enforcement
of
the
Rent
Stabilization
Laws
as
a
violation
of
Due
Process"
https://www.docketbird.com/court-documents/Community-Housing-Improvement-Program-et-al-v-City-of-New-York-et-al/Letter-dated-October-8-2019-from-Towaki-Komatsu-to-Judge-Brodie-requesting-that-the-motion-to-intervene-be-granted/nyed-1:2019-cv-04087-00042
Towaki
Komatsu
802
Fairmount
PL
Apt.
4B
Bronx,
NY
10460
Tel:
718-450-6951
E-mail:
Towaki
Komatsu@vahoo.com
October
8,
2019
United
States
District
Judge
Margo
Brodi
United
States
District
Court
225
Cadman
Plaza
East
Brooklyn,
New
York
11201
Re:
Community
Housing
Improvement
Program
v.
City
of
New
York,
No.
19-CV-4087
(MKB)(RML)
(E.D.N.Y.)
Dear
Judge
Brodi,
The
letter
dated
10/4/19
that
Michael
Berg
of
the
New
York
State
Attorney
General's
fi
led
in
this
action
is
a
nullity.
This
is
mainly
because
he
didn't
request
my
consent
to
receive
any
fi
lings
in
this
action
fi
-om
him
via
and
I
haven't
consented
to
that.
Since
he
is
an
attorney,
this
Court
mustn't
grant
him
any
leniency
with
respect
to
complying
with
all
applicable
procedures
in
relation
to
this
action
that
includes
proper
service
of
papers.
Furthermore,
attorneys
specialize
in
lying,
misleading,
expressing
half-truths,
conveniently
omitting
material
facts,
and
gamesmanship.
I
am
not
among
Mr.
Berg's
ilk
in
that
respect.
Mr.
Berg
neglected
to
inform
this
court
about
the
following
pertinent
facts
that
relate
to
the
remarks
that
he
expressed
in
the
letter
dated
10/4/19
that
I
received
fi
*om
him
via
at
5:12
pm
on
10/4/19:
1.
I
haven't
been
contacted
by
the
plaintiffs
in
this
action
nor
their
attorneys
and
have
no
reason
to
believe
that
views
expressed
by
Mr.
Berg
in
his
communications
to
me
reflect
their
views.
Page
1
of
15
Case 1:19-cv-04087-MKB-RLM Document 42 Filed 10/08/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 271
2.
The
following
requests
for
relief
are
among
those
specified
by
the
plaintiffs
in
this
action
on
page
119
and
120
in
the
complaint
that
was
fi
led
in
this
action:
a.
"Declare
the
Rent
Stabilization
Laws
to
be
an
unlawful
violation
of
Due
Process"
b.
"Enjoin
the
application
and
enforcement
of
the
Rent
Stabilization
Laws
as
a
violation
of
Due
Process"
Comments
Post a Comment